On Thursday 26 June 2003 10:59 pm, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2003 09:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > with riaa suing there's a lot more heat about freenet on sites like
> > zeropaid than ever. Now is a great time to score some points - we can't
> > rush the nio release (well, we could but its not a good idea), but we
> > could definitely make the website more colorful and idiot-friendly (and
> > remove that god-awful mention of "turn based games like chess").
Doesn't the RIAA realize it's killing itself, both PR-wise and by making
anonymity popular?
> Yeah, the site could use some updating. However I think one thing that will
> draw a lot more users is when we get gcj working so you don't have to tell
> people they have to go download java.
Many people already have it (Windows) or don't mind (Linux). If there's a
Windows gcj binary build, however, there's the problem of extra DLLs. MinGW
(mingw.sf.net) only needs msvcrt.dll, but therefore doesn't have POSIX
support. Does gcj need POSIX?
--
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they go by."
- Douglas Adams
Nick Tarleton - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGP key available
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
