That is unfortunate - we went ahead with NIO because there are Open Source implementations out there - although they still need work.
I am sorry to say that you will just need to stick with a pre-NIO build until Java support on *BSD improves :-( Ian. On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:04:15PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote: > I updated my snapshot today to receive the error: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > java/nio/channels/spi/AbstractSelectableChannel > at freenet.node.Node.init(Node.java, Compiled Code) > at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java, Compiled Code) > > My systems, which are NetBSD, are not JDK 1.4 capable -- and in fact, were > until recently only capable of 1.1, but could still run a node. New > features in JDK 1.4 should not be considered "write once run anywhere" until > there's many more platforms than just Win & Lin in the "anywhere".... 8-) > > The latest I can go reliably is 1.3.1 -- I happen to be maintaining that JDK > port. Based on mailing list research, I can vouch for the other *BSDs in > noting that JDK 1.4 is not particularly stable on any of them (whether using > a "native" JDK, or a Linux JDK under emulation). > > Oddly enough, I can't find in the CVS source where any Channel class is > being accessed from Node.java in Node.init(). > > So, what's the verdict? Is NIO considered the Only Way in future Fred, or > was the above a coding fluke that should have been wrappered by a try/catch > to activate the older I/O code? > > -- > -- Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Founder, Locutus http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
