On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Gordan wrote: > Isn't this precisely what limiting simultaneous connections does already?
No, because it will keep accepting new connections regardless of how slowly it is able to serve the connections it already has. > Byte-by-byte transfers are inefficient, I agree. Would it not be better, then > to do it packet-by-packet instead? It reduces the granularity, so it should > still work OK, even it is marginaly more bursty. It isn't an issue of granularity. Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Weblog http://slashdot.org/~sanity/journal
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
