|
Hi,
I have contacted some of you before (well, at
least, I've spoken to some on IIRC). While it was for an article about
freenet at the time, the issuing conversations also mentionned the
financial needs of freenet. As it's mentionned on the freenet site, this remains
a somewhat uncertain issue, especially in regard to the (continuing) fulltime
work of Toad.
I suggested then, that it might be a good idea
to seek out additional sponsors, be it non-profit organisations, or even
commercial compagnies. In return, we could set up modest banners on the site (I
mean the freenet site on the www, NOT anything on freenet itself) or we could
make a 'sponsor page' with links, or little banners, or a combination of both,
depending on the level of sponsoring. (One could argue that, if a compagny would
offer to sponor 1000 bucks a month for a year, it could deserve a banner on the
main page, while $5 for one month would at most be worth a link on the
sponors-page, or something to that regard).
In general, this proposal was met very positively,
though (as always ;-) there were a few remarks too:
- for instance, the possibility that freenet could
associate itself with a compagny with 'bad image', which would rub it off on
freenet.
A valid remark, though it should be noted that it's
difficult to imagine a compagny doing that. I mean, apart from promoting and
selling illegal things, which no legal compagnies exist for, what could possibly
really damage freenet that badly? Presumably, Pr0n Inc. is at issue, but, seen
the fact that freenet will rather undermine their (commercial) business then
sustain it, I think it's rather unlikely to happen. And, in fact, as long as it
helps pay one or maybe several developers, and seen the temporal nature,
I wouldn't mind to much. Heck, I would even accept money from the RIAA! ;-)
What irony wouldn't that be!
In any case, if some sort of moderator for the job
would be needed, I'm volunteering, and if Pr0n-compagnies sponsoring would be
deemed 'unproper', so be it. But we can all agree that organisations like the
EFF would be prime candidates, and I think there is a definite potential for
free-speech and IT/tech organisations and compagnies. Maybe enough for a second
developer, who knows?
If anyone (meaning; those that have any say in the
matter ;-) is interested, I'm willing to take this job of
sponsor-seeking&handling on me, because I'm fully aware that it's more of a
manager issue then a developers'one. (which was another remark made; that
developers don't have time for such a thing). Since I'm part-time manager and
part-time IT free-lance writer, I have no problem with it.
So, that was basically it. I have a bit more
detailed idea about the how and what, but I think that's better discussed more
directly, instead of here.
Sincerely,
Newsbite
|
- [freenet-dev] Funding Ian Clarke
- [freenet-dev] Re: funding Newsbite
- [freenet-dev] Re: funding Ian Clarke
- [freenet-dev] Re: funding Newsbite
- Re: [freenet-dev] funding Toad
- Re: [freenet-dev] funding Nick Tarleton
