On Thursday 25 September 2003 03:06, fish wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:31:55PM -0500, Pascal wrote: > > Interesting story on Slashdot today. I wonder how hard it would be to > > implement in Freenet? > > > > http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/24/132216 > > Yes, just what we need, an RBL list that is even less fucking accountable. > > This has 'bad idea' written all over it.
I see the reasoning behind what you are saying, but nobody is forcing anyone to use any RBL. If a RBL is too draconian for you, don't use it. For one that errs more on the side of caution. RBLs DO help. Period. I have mail logs that prove it. Instead of 50%+ of my email being spam, it is down to about 5%. That is clearly a very positive result. If you have to download the email to spam check it, then you have already taken a bandwidth hit for the whole lot, so milters are a _second_ line of defense. But again, we are getting off topic. Gordan _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
