On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:02:09PM -0500, J wrote: > Quoting Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Suggestion: > > I implement multiplexing and test it on a local testbed of a few nodes. > > I don't implement any kind of backward compatibility. > > Followed by a larger testbed of a few volunteers' nodes. > > Followed by a network reset - wide deployment, without backward > > compatibility. > > I'd personally see this idea as being "the way to go". It may be painful in > the beginning but will overall produce a much much better design. Workarounds > & backwards compatibilty = overhead and lots of it.
Code overhead. Not runtime overhead. Well, mostly. > > I could probably even devote some hardware to a do some local testing. > > j. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
