On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:39:15AM +0100, Pete wrote: > <wilde> hello everyone > [frontier] lo widle > [frontier] wilde ;) > <wilde> are there any good node.refs out there? > <wilde> 5028 build > [frontier] doubt it quoting toad When I say wide deployment, I still > mean unstable branch - only the crazy people. The stable network is left > to rot until the unstable code is ready, and then we merge the unstable > code to the stable branch and when users update to stable, they will > transition over to the new network.
Hey, don't quote me out of context, frontier! That was hypothetical, should we decide to do multiplexing in one great non-backwards-compatible lump. > <wilde> My node has some serious trouble, and I'd like it to really > join a functional part of the network > <wilde> frontier: so everyone is having serious trouble? > [frontier] freenet isn't functional toads admitted it > <wilde> sorry to hear that > *** qwntm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #freenet > [frontier] tey stuffed it themselves they have to rebuild it now > <wilde> i can't connect to a single node, not just unstable, it's > really down > [frontier] wide you and 85% of the rest of the freenet users > <wilde> ok > > Just after you left toad > > Care to answer? ;-) sorry not flaming just keeping a valid point open, > and please notice your quote about rot ;) > > Pete > > Ps I'll run the unstable code when you get around to doing it, I just > want to be able to read scum/fillament/reskill/thoughtcrime and others > again :-( > -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
