On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 12:12:16AM +1000, fish wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:57:18PM +0100, Toad wrote: > > Quite possible WITHOUT reimplementing the monolithic store. What I mean > > is, I do NOT want the user cache to be implemented as a single file. The > > way that we should do this is to store the files in a temporary > > directory that gets wiped on startup, using opaque filenames and keys > > stored only in RAM - but one file for one key. Since we pad out to > > powers of two, the leak of data from knowing the sizes of the files is > > negligible. > > well, the localstore code i have now (as i said, freenet.client based, not > freenet.node, so useless for this, but could proably be reused) works in > this way at paranoia level = 1. i mostly suggested storing them all in > a monolithic file because, if I said that, people would complain that the > crypto wasn't strong enough, and they'd possibly be right.
(nessesary disclaimer, before I start a long thread on this subject: routing
is far more important right now, I am not suggesting that this needs to be done
right this minute, i'm just chiming in since I can't really speak intelligably
on the other debates going on right now :-p
pay me no mind
-- fish)
--
I'm sick and fucking tired of not getting people drunk.
-- blixco, http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/8/20/105121/869
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
