On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:06:32PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > Toad wrote: > >Suggestion: > >I implement multiplexing and test it on a local testbed of a few nodes. > >I don't implement any kind of backward compatibility. > >Followed by a larger testbed of a few volunteers' nodes. > >Followed by a network reset - wide deployment, without backward > >compatibility. > > I am a bit concerned that this is another example of implementing new > features rather than making existing features work properly... :-/
Heh. I am doing plenty of that too. It's just that with all the talk of network forks, I thought it might be useful to consider the alternatives. At this stage I believe we can probably get the unstable/stable network working acceptable and merge. I do however want to implement multiplexing before we release 0.6, because of its massive benefits. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
