--- Martin Stone Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In any case, I think this thread is complete... Toad's premix routing > solution (when he's able to get to it) will solve the anonymity problems > I raised.
Don't want to reil anyone up but...... Long term if we implement something like premix routing, we could change the underlieing network to some more efficient DHT as long as it was secure against DSA and other censorship attacks dirrected at the data. In the end we'd probably wind up with a two layer network dividing and conquering the problem. One layer would take care of requestor/poster annonymity, and the other would take care of safe storage. I see two nice ways they could interact: 1) If I build several annoymous tunnels I can send data to the most appropriate end node to improve routing costs some. 2) The DHT's traffic and topology should provide great cover against several atacks on the anonoymizing layer. I know this is all very long term, but if we've resigned ourselves to implement some premix solution, it seems logical to keep this idea in the back of our heads. __________________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Logos und Klingelt�ne f�rs Handy bei http://sms.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
