> I have followed this discussion with interest. It seems to me that if > you put the JRE on your server, in a non-listable directory (perhaps > even password protected) and avoid publishing the path and file name > anywhere else than in the windows installer configuration file, then > Sun's rules will be followed almost to the letter, and certainly in > spirit: no-one will be able to download the JRE unless they have > already downloaded the installer.
Yes. Which is why I refuse to revert to the old installer (although nothing is stopping anyone else with cvs and sftp access from doing this). The issue that Sun pointed to me as in breach was that we were hosting in its entirety the Sun JRE on our server, in a publicly accessible folder to which we were directing ALL of our potential users. Hence my comment a few moments ago about making the installer get the JRE from Sun's servers rather than ours. d _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
