On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:38:04AM +0000, Jonathan Howard wrote: > Pruning the routing table first deletes nodes with Consecutive Failures, > which is fine. (I can see sometimes that I wouldn't always want this, > but that's another issue) > > What I see now are alot of the nodes with high Connection Attempts & > Successful Connections are the ones with the highest Successful > Transfers. (there weren't many before with unstable split, maybe most > having good network connection). This could mean these are in fact the > best but I'm thinking;
This is not really surprising. The node that succeeds more will have more connection churn, especially since we don't have multiplexing. > > The compare is favouring (to keep) these because createdTime is new. No, createdTime is only low for a node newly in the routing table. It is NOT updated when we connect. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
