On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:41:59AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: > Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Make sure it's reasonably easy to extend it... there will only be a few > > possible fields on a given message, but there may be new messages etc. > > So far we have less than 50 messages (I think it's around 25 or so, > but I'll estimate high to prove my point). I'm allocating a whole
How many fields do we have? > byte for messages, so we have 5* expansion potential with using only > single-byte encodings. And of course we can always do the UTF thing > and use multi-byte encodings if we need to. But I realy doubt we'll > come up with 200 more messages. > > The fields part will be handled such that unknown fields (to the > compression function) just get high-bitted, and sent through as they > are. This way arbitrary fieldsets can still be transmitted, but the > fields we use commonly are still sent efficiently. > > Thelema > -- > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raabu and Piisu > GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
