On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:14:44PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: > Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:48:13AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: > > > Every routed request already has a UniqueID; why would we make up a > > > new ID system just for QRs? Currently, QRs are between 80 and 100 > > > bytes, I plan on having them down to 12 bytes. Dropping to a 2 byte > > > QueryID value would make QRs 6 bytes, but at these sizes, packet > > > overhead is going to dominate anyway, so there's no real benefit in a > > > smaller QueryID. I'm not sure that packet overhead won't make my > > > changes useless, but I'm willing to try and find out. If you want to > > > pitch in, feel free to start hacking on fred. > > > > I make it 17... you are missing out any field specifiers? Typical QR: > > QueryRejected > > HopsToLive=8 > > Reason=Node overloaded > > Attenuation=1 > > UniqueID=5059d54c3cd2b593 > > EndMessage > > > You're probably right; I was doing all the counting in my head, and > forgot about Reason. What kind of values does Attenuation have?
I'm not sure that it's used at present, but it might be in future. > > Thelema > -- > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raabu and Piisu > GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
