What "magic bytes"? The only "magic bytes" I can think of that the client shouldn't know about are the PAgM. If InvertPrivateKey doesn't return this, then some people should be whipped, and it should be changed or a better command introduced and the original deprecated. Then it would be: "SSK@" + publicKey + "/path" [ + "//subpath" ]
-----Original Message----- From: Edgar Friendly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Nov 4, 2003 11:56 AM To: Discussion of development issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Will FCP InvertPrivateKey continue to be supported? David McNab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please *don't* do that - it's an incredibly useful function. > Without it, clients have to insert a dummy SSK at htl=0 to convert > private keys into public ones. > Clients *shouldn't* be converting private keys into public ones. The reason being that they should be using the return value of ClientPut as the URI, not pasting one together out of the public key and some magic bytes. Thelema -- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raabu and Piisu GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
