Hi, Toad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-06: > Please could I have some more stats: > outputBytesAttemptedTrailing versus outputBytes > > Hour averages are preferred.
outputBytes: 11/6/03 9:00:00 PM CET 11194 2792036 1497235.0470887637 133.391102376273 11/6/03 10:00:00 PM CET 21997 8172843 6327630.6168567175 163.65063417738781 outputBytesAttemptedTrailing: 11/6/03 9:00:00 PM CET 589 9344270 4953188.407447319 2530.2801358234296 11/6/03 10:00:00 PM CET 918 12440517 1.6937633636603385E7 3914.932461873638 > Most nodes QueryReject a LOT, and most of those seem to be because of > bandwidth usage. If as is suspected, outputBytesAttemptedTrailing is > only a small part of outputBytes, the solution is to implement a binary > presentation for messages to reduce the bandwidth used by e.g. > QueryRejected messages. If however outputBytesAttemptedTrailing accounts > for most of the total outputBytes, we have more subtle problems. Umh... If I interpret that correctly, it's weird that I have _more_ outputBytesAttemptedTrailing than outputBytes? ciao, -- [*Thomas Themel*] Usenet is not fair. After all, who shall decide what's fair? [extended contact] For that matter, if someone is behaving unfairly, who's going [info provided in] to stop him? Neither you nor I, that's certain. [*message header*] - <http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html>
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
