On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:29:39PM -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > Toad wrote: > > >On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:16:57PM -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > > > >>3. Before sending a QR, check the version of the requestor. Then, if > >>it's a version w/o QR backoff, simply drop request. That way, we would > >>stall them, their tSearchFailure would go up, and NGR would encourage > >>them to try another node. (Of course, if we can handle the request, > >>handle it regardless of the version.) > >>* PRO: Pretty simple to implement. > >>* CON: Carne! > > > > > >This is implied by increasing lastGoodBuild. > > Maybe it's a moot point, but: Doesn't increasing lastGoodBuild cause us > to not respond to any queries from the older nodes? Option #3 above
Yes. Well, we QR the first time then we drop them completely, I think there may be some exponential backoff in it in case the node is restarted. > implies that we would handle the query if we are not too busy. Does > increasing lastGoodBuild imply that too? > > -Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
