> Niklas Bergh wrote: > >>>I think freenet is suffering because it doesn't have key space > >>>specialisation. NGR is trying to route quickly, all > un-overload are > >>>quick, get the traffic, route to each other, overload, etc. > >> > >>If this is the case we should try to reduce QRs as much as > possible - > >>remove QR based on bandwidth, messageSendTime and > >>routingTime, and try > >>to reduce the number of threads used with more NIO. > >> > > > > > > I definitely saw better pSuccess values and much less local > overload > > when QR based on bw was disabled last week. > > So did I, but that was because my outgoing bw was less. And > that's not > good. Just because Load=100% doesn't mean your node isn't doing good > for the network.
Indeed but sending 9 QR:s for every Q served is not good. Last week my node accepted about 85% of all queries directed against it (and that was because the network gave my node less queries.. Not just because my node accepted more). My outgoing bw during last week was just the same as it is now and was before last week. /N _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
