Hi,
Ed Tomlinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-19:
> Problem is that all the flies can enter the swamp but they can only leave
> through a couple small tubes.  The flies breed and the frogs and fish cannot 
> eat them fast enough so lots of them queue at the exit tubes.

I don't quite get the vermin analogy... Could you find one that uses
queries, QRs and messages? :)

> The request success ratios are great, often over 0.25, but the routing 
> success ratios only 0.02 over the same period.   Interestingly looking
> at the outputbyte counters I am using 95% of my available bandwidth
> and over 80% of that is to send trailers.

Exactly. I have what I believe to be extremely bad routingSuccessRatio
lately.

   | 11/13/03 12:00:00 AM CET  | 54392  | 1194      | 0.021951757611413443  |
   |---------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------|
   | 11/14/03 12:00:00 AM CET  | 90193  | 812       | 0.009002915969088511  |
   |---------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------|
   | 11/15/03 12:00:00 AM CET  | 170186 | 597       | 0.0035079266214612247 |
   |---------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------|
   | 11/17/03 12:00:00 AM CET  | 241395 | 415       | 0.0017191739679777956 |
   |---------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------|
   | 11/18/03 12:00:00 AM CET  | 526215 | 257       | 4.883935273604895E-4  |

> So its serving requests using all the bandwidth I give it but they are
> mostly from the DS.  Does this imply that with small bandwidth limits
> we also want a small DS or that we should limit the max file size stored 
> on a node to depending on output bandwidth?

I have a 10G data store that currently is 5.6G on disk. Perhaps this is
indeed oversized for the ISDN link.

On a related note, I'm thinking of moving the node to a DSL uplink for
the rest of the month (I've only got 20GB to waste per month on the DSL
link, and that takes my node about 10 days). Does anyone care to predict
whether it will adjust to the new situation quickly enough for the speed
increase to be useful, and whether it will adjust to the meagre
bandwidth when switching it back? If doing this is bad, that might be
part of my node's problems - I've switched it between ISDN and DSL a few
times in the past few months.

> Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 509 (452/57/512)
> Connections transferring (Transmitting/Receiving) 21 (15/6)
> Data waiting to be transmitted/received/sending 7,317 KiB/1,181 KiB/498 KiB

Interesting. I remember seeing that, but when I look in my 6339
Connection Manager, it's back to the less informative

| Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)          299 (199/100/2048) 
| Connections transferring (Transmitting/Receiving)  40 (12/28)         
| Data waiting to be transfered                      42 MiB             
| Total amount of data transferred                   134 MiB            

What build are the verbose stats from?

ciao,
-- 
[*Thomas  Themel*]      one with nintendo
[extended contact]      halcyon symbiosis
[info provided in]      hand thinks for itself
[*message header*]  -- D. A. Koronakos and B. Roberts; "High-tech Haikus"
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to