On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:13:17PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: > Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Toad wrote: > > > > > Is there any reason not to keep the backoff data when a node is dropped > > > from the routing table? > > > > Provided we delete it sometime, probably not. > > > > Ian. > > > > Why stop at just keeping backoff data? Keep routing information to > nodes we aren't routing to (because of backoff, no connection, being > dropped from RT, etc.) in an offline cache, so that if we ever do put > them back in the RT, we're not losing information.
Well, if they come back to the RT, most likely they will have somebody else's estimator data attached to them, which is more recent than ours anyway. > > Thelema > -- > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raabu and Piisu > GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
