Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
Is there any reason not to keep the backoff data when a node is dropped
from the routing table?
Provided we delete it sometime, probably not.
Yes, there is. Given that it is a completely transient condition, why
would we want to remember this unpleasant experience ? Are we still
having trouble with high RT churning ? Do we understand just how
quickly a node can change its mind on whether it is "overloaded" ?
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
