Sorry, I should have been clearer.. I think that this 0.5.3 idea is a good one but what I meant was: 1. Do the 0.5.3 2. Muxing or something 3. More NGR.
/N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of development issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Separating dev and stable > Niklas Bergh wrote: > > A thought.. Why not give NGR development a couple of weeks break and try to > > get muxing or something up and running in the mean time? When you have no > > relly good ideas on some specific problem it can be good to move over to a > > completely different matter for a while and then get back to tackling the > > original hurdles with renewed energy afterwards. > > Because the current situation is untenable and we have to do something > to rectify it - implementing muxing probably won't fix the issues that > are preventing NGR from working, and while NGR doesn't work, Freenet > doesn't work. > > The proposal is to release a non-NGR 0.5.3 which includes all or most > other innovations since 0.5.2. This will give Toad a break from NGR > while others keep working on it. It will relieve the time-pressure to > get NGR working, and it will mean that Joe-user has a working version of > Freenet (we hope) while those interested in helping with NGR can do-so. > > Ian. > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
