On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:46:04AM -0500, Edward J. Huff wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:31, Pete wrote: > > Just looked at my nodes stats before I close it down for the time being > > and I noticed this figure > > Outbound connections that are to peers not in the routingtable > > 20.37037% > > > > Why aren't these peers being added to the routing table? They obviously > > are capable of dealing with request which [these nodes obviously] aren't, > > I know churning the rt is not exactly a great thing to > > do, but I think it may help in the long run if we drop nodes that really > > are behaving badly for ones that are working, just a suggestion... > > > > I asked how these connections got established. It seems we _never_ send > requests to nodes not in the RT. Ergo, they were in the RT but got > dropped. I haven't checked the code to make certain, however.
No. They sent US requests. > > -- Ed Huff -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
