On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:59:28AM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On December 02, 2003 08:23 pm, Toad wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:44:18PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > Toast's proposal also requires no queue and adds no latency. And is > > better. > > Fine. Would you like me to implement it so you can work on something else? > > First step iteration would not try to add Martin's logic for taking into account > nodes that come out of backoff. > > Ed
If you can do it quickly and accurately, mail me. Otherwise I'll implement it soon i.e. in the next 48 hours or so. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
