Oops. Much bigger problem. Pretty much all edition sites are [EMAIL PROTECTED]/name/number//
This isn't possible with single slashes as manifest separators! You would have to do [EMAIL PROTECTED]/name-number/ Or we could implement TUKs. Hrrrm! It can be annoying that everyone is asleep sometimes... :| On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:53:04PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Here is the remaining problem: > > CHK's names are optional and mutable. > > The same file can be: > [EMAIL PROTECTED],abc/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED],abc/linux-2.6.0.tar.bz2 > [EMAIL PROTECTED],abc/penguins.jpeg > [EMAIL PROTECTED],abc/GPL.txt > > Now, if we use / for "enter container/manifest", there is a major > ambiguity problem above! > > One option would be to not allow this; if people want to give CHK's > names, they should do so on creating them. These are then fixed. (You > simply have a metadata manifest with only one element in it). > > Given that // is just ugly, and both tools and people can be expected > to be repelled by it, I think it is worth the hassle. It does not change > performance, as a sub-32K CHK will usually have a redirect for the > content type, and a super-32K CHK will always have a splitfile manifest; > we are adding a small number of bytes to the size of the control > document. It does mean that users would no longer be able to arbitrarily > change CHK filenames. Arguably that's a good thing. > > SSK names are also optional, but I doubt there will be any serious > objections to making them mandatory. > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:07:07PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Proposal: > > > > We abolish double slashes. > > > > When a container is first accessed, it is fully unpacked into cache, > > including its .metadata. If the container does not include a .metadata, > > we generate one. This allows users to do, for example, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/freenet-20060718.tgz/lib/freenet-ext.jar without having to > > insert a metadata redirect (there are of course size limits). > > > > The cache is a set of ephemerally encrypted, padded files. The files, > > including the metadata, are kept individually in an LRU. > > > > A metadata manifest is a metadata document which is a map of names to > > metadata documents. The latter can be container-internal redirects, > > which refer to a file inside the container; they can be redirects to any > > URI; they can be splitfiles, and particularly they can be manifests. > > > > Any and all access to files, even archive manifests (aka containers) > > occurs via metadata manifests. Metadata manifests are "directories". > > > > So: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED],blah/WhateverFlog/images/war/bomb.jpeg > > > > => > > Fetch [EMAIL PROTECTED],blah/WhateverFlog > > Is a splitfile, and a tar.bz2 manifest. > > Need the metadata; not in cache; fetch the splitfile; unpack into cache. > > Extract the metadata. > > Find "images" - is a manifest. > > Find "war" - is a manifest. > > Find "bomb.jpeg" - is "images/war/bomb.jpeg" inside the tar.bz2, is > > image/jpeg. > > Extract it, return it to the user. > > -- > > Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > -- > Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
