That's a separate mechanism (backoff).
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:46:38AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > >- If it is below 1000ms, we accept all requests. > >- If it is above 2000ms, we reject (almost) all requests. > >- If it is between we accept some requests but not all. > > If half your peers are overloaded but the other half are OK, would you > reject all requests with equal probability or selectively reject those > requests that would be forwarded to overloaded peers? > > Rather than taking the mean over all peers, how about rejecting requests > that would be forwarded to an overloaded peer, as determined by the > ratio between the peer's ping time over (say) the last minute and its > ping time over the lifetime of the connection? Or perhaps treat that > peer as temporarily disconnected and forward the request to the > next-best peer instead? > > Cheers, > Michael -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
