-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I think when we have applications that explicitly rely on requesting
keys that probably haven't been inserted yet, the proportion of
successful requests is not a good measure of the network's
effectiveness.
A good measure of the network's effectiveness is to manually insert
keys at one node, and request those keys from another node,
preferably one that is as far as possible from the first in the
network topology, while monitoring the success rate.
Ian.
On 26 Apr 2006, at 06:12, Matthew Toseland wrote:
With Jogy's new code to show the counts of messages for individual
nodes, we have some rather depressing statistics once again.
The apparent success rate on CHK requests is pretty bad... 1 in 3 at
best, 1 in 10 or worse is common... The success rate on SSK
requests is
even worse, but that's to be expected as that's mostly Frost.
Possible explanations:
- Bug in the stats collection.
- People requesting files that haven't been inserted yet.
- Perverse network topology.
- Data not keeping up with location swaps.
- Load balancing/limiting not working.
Any ideas on how to determine which of the above is correct? Or other
possible explanations?
Generally feedback has been pretty good... I wonder if this might be
something like Frost requesting files that haven't been uploaded yet?
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFET6SQQtgxRWSmsqwRAriSAJ45Z8VxU4PULeXCf2TgdlZ0rygMhACfcxqu
7bG7Cwf+xAJcuBtlatyHtrs=
=t5U3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
