On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:13:12PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > Our original assumption was that doing Freenet entirely with threads > would be excessively resource intensive - this may or may not be true. > > If it is true, there are a few new continuations libraries around > that I want to take note of: > > http://jauvm.blogspot.com/
We cannot depend on a non-standard JVM. And according to the Aug 31 update it has some serious issues! > and... > > http://rifers.org/blogs/gbevin/2005/9/23/announcing_rifecontinuations Excellent!! This is the preferred solution. We may however want to defer using continuations to 0.8 or even 0.9; it depends whether we have practical performance problems. Certainly I have seen OOM: cannot create thread, although I have no idea why; after a dump later on there were very few threads running. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
