The point is that there is no point. They take up space without
serving any useful purpose. This is a particular problem for those
with limited-width mail readers such as Mutt or Pine.
Ian.
On 3 May 2006, at 16:17, John C.C.White wrote:
OK. I'll disagree:
- the list is low-volume
- Subject: headers rarely overflow my (entirely reasonable) space
allocated
- I haven't seen any bogus [freenet-devl] messages (yet).
Really, what's the point/need?
-John-
On May 3, 2006, at 6:47 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
This makes a pretty persuasive argument for ditching the [freenet-
devl] subject tags on mailing list emails:
http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/qralston/writing/tagging-harmful/
If nobody can come up with a good argument against this, I suggest
we follow its advice and remove the Subject tags.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
