* David Sowder (Zothar) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 00:12:12]:
> David Sowder (Zothar) wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>Author: zothar
> >>Date: 2006-05-11 04:24:24 +0000 (Thu, 11 May 2006)
> >>New Revision: 8652
> >>
> >>Modified:
> >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/io/NetworkInterface.java
> >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/io/comm/Peer.java
> >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java
> >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
> >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
> >>Log:
> >>When no IP addresses are available for handshake, reset the handshake
> >>timer. Only do DNS lookups during handshake and store the result.
> >>Explicitly set Java's negative DNS cache TTL. Factored out the
> >>repeated use of some address lookup methods within a few lines of
> >>each other. Fixed an NPE caused by trying to call the canGetCipher()
> >>method on a null DHContext. Added another short-circuit to
> >>getHandshakeIPs().
> >>
> >To whomever is in charge of the FreenetLogBot related auto-builder,
> >the SVN revision of 8652 seems to be properly displayed everywhere but
> >on the running node, which still thinks it's on r8649 (the changes
> >otherwise are in the newly built and downloaded version). Maybe this
> >problem is related to the Eclipse substitution question (dunno if the
> >auto-builder uses it)?
> Ah, this is because the keyword substitution does not change the string
> in Version.java unless Version.java has changed. To solve the annoyance
> of editing files, perhaps the revision could be made derived during the
> build process. The OpenTTD folks write a "#include" file for their C++
> code at build time with the revision and uses that verbatim "in-game".
> They use the following to derive the revision:
>
> $(shell if test -d .svn; then svnversion . | awk '{ print "r"$$0 }'; fi)
>
> this has the benefit of working even with local modification (indicated
> by a "M" suffix).I don't get your point : why is it a problem that "local" changes aren't displayed ? Don't you know what you are running ? ;) it's eclipse's fault ! last time I did shell scripting to update the Version file, people complained : "it's not portable, doesn't work with eclipse's auto-build" ... what's your proposal ? the shell thingy ? won't work on windows :) NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
