On 5/13/06, Caco Patane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about SHUTDOWN in capital letters, and if it's entered normally a
warning that it should be on capital letters?
Is there any CAPS LOCK fan?
Saludos,
Caco_Patane <!>
On 5/12/06, David Sowder (Zothar) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Quite frankly to have an application stopped by the same command that
stops your OS
> > is dangerious. Over the years I have been bitten by this sort of buglet a
few times...
> >
> Mind you, I've only checked MS Windows XP, Mac OS X and Debian Linux
> (many share the same program though I believe), I haven't found a common
> OS that shuts down by issuing a "shutdown" command with no arguments.
> Perhaps you could fill me in? What would you suggest instead of
> "shutdown" considering that it's the most obvious and "quit" is the most
> common for what it does?
> > On Friday 12 May 2006 09:18, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote:
> >
> >> Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> >>
> >>> HI
> >>>
> >>> Please revert this.
> >>>
> >>> its OK that quit exits in TCMI. Its not a problem. Its a good thing.
> >>>
> >>> This fix just confuses things.
> >>>
> >>> Its not a good idea.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> And I would argue the opposite. QUIT should not mean different things
> >> in different contexts if we can easily help it. Different meanings
> >> leads to use out of habit giving you a result you didn't expect, in this
> >> case it would be node shutdown. Imagine using the socket interface a
> >> lot and then using the direct console for some reason, typing QUIT and
> >> going to lunch; your node would be shutdown unintentionally until you
> >> noticed at some point. Obviously, this is up for discussion in the
> >> group, but I'm unclear how this change confuses anything.
> >>
> >> Admittedly, QUIT used to be the command to shutdown in either
> >> environment, but that was changed a couple of weeks ago and I believe
> >> the current arrangement is much more logical and consistent with other
> >> applications.
> >>
> >>> On Thursday 11 May 2006 22:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Author: zothar
> >>>> Date: 2006-05-12 02:43:18 +0000 (Fri, 12 May 2006)
> >>>> New Revision: 8672
> >>>>
> >>>> Modified:
> >>>> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
> >>>> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/TextModeClientInterface.java
> >>>> Log:
> >>>> This should make a few interface elements more consistent: 'QUIT' just
plain isn't a command in direct TMCI console mode rather than having a different meaning there
than on a network socket, display the running node's build number and SVN revision number
consistently everywhere (and now also in the logs on start up).
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl@freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
And the void rumbles in
Like an underground train
Forever comes closer
The world is in pain
We all must be shown, we must realise
That everyone changes and everything dies
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT dpu s:-- a-- C++ UL+++ P-- L++ E--- W+++ N o-- K- w---
O---- M V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP t+ 5-- X+ R+++ tv-- b++ DI-- D++
G++ e h+ r-- y**
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
In all my years on *nix I've never seen any distribution that shut
down on just plain shitdown, it always needed -h now too.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
