Since we are in a state of alpha, why not keep lastGoodBuild fairly
recent? Maybe a window of 15 node versions? The people that are
running this at this early stage surely don't mind updating their
nodes every 2 weeks or so, and throwing out the few older nodes that
aren't getting updated might make troubleshooting the network a bit
easier...
On 5/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: toad
Date: 2006-05-17 16:45:10 +0000 (Wed, 17 May 2006)
New Revision: 8745
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Version.java
Log:
717: Up minimum build to 698. (minor incompatible change in that build in
on-network ip address detection; flush out old nodes with really old bugs too!)
Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Version.java
===================================================================
--- trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Version.java 2006-05-17 15:21:37 UTC (rev
8744)
+++ trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Version.java 2006-05-17 16:45:10 UTC (rev
8745)
@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@
public static final String protocolVersion = "1.0";
/** The build number of the current revision */
- private static final int buildNumber = 716;
+ private static final int buildNumber = 717;
/** Oldest build of Fred we will talk to */
- private static final int lastGoodBuild = 591;
+ private static final int lastGoodBuild = 698;
public static final int buildNumber() {
return buildNumber;
_______________________________________________
cvs mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
--
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
