On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 12:47:26AM +0200, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:16, David McNab wrote:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED],-4C87kRu4QB7Z5UmZpSpn
> >iBlrmwJtDKr35AZ-m-jDEg,AAEC--8.txt
> 
> Well, this is pretty ugly, if you ask me. From what you said on IRC I 
> thought you'd want something like [EMAIL PROTECTED],fjewf,aaa/file.ext. Which 
> I 
> would find much more logical: people can deduct from the filename what 
> it is (though the filename may be fake, of course) and fproxy can get a 
> filename for background downloading from it. Also, that is the way it 
> was with Freenet 0.5.

That was possible with freenet 0.5 because of the // hack. In freenet
0.7, a slash always indicates a real path component - a manifest lookup,
or part of a URI which is significant in itself (e.g. with USKs).
> 
>       David
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to