On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:19:10PM +0100, Volodya wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:19:40AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>>Regarding "activelinks", what do you mean exactly ? > >>>95x32 icons for freesites. > >>what about changing this to 96x32 so this is at least scalable in size > >>(/2, /4). "95" is so an odd number... > > > >Good idea, nobody uses them yet on 0.7 anyway... > > Well, i was beginning to use them, but change for a good reason isn't bad > at all. I'd suggest 96*36 though, so you can also do 1/3
Well, 96:32 is exactly 3:1, which is nice, and it's very close to the original, which is also nice... We don't have much influence over this; it's down to what the site authors do. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
