On 6/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>There has been some discussion about what size activelinks should be in
>freenet.7
>Read about it:
>http://archives.freenetproject.org/thread/20060607.193351.af1b5a82.en.html
>
>It is unsure is we are able to change the common activelink size in freenet
>.7 , but if we want to change it, what should it become.
>
>I am personally in favor of 108 x 36, because it's better scalable and
>because the size is not TOO simillar to the old 95 x 32. If the difference
>is very small, people will not notice it and we probably won't get 1
>standard.
>
>Current proposols:


95 x 32 (the old one)
96 x 32 (/2, /4, /8, /16, /32) (ratio 96/32=3)
96 x 36 (/2, /3, /4, /6, /12)
108 x 36 (/2, /3, /4, /6, /9, /12, /18, /36) (ratio 108/36=3)




108 x 36 has my vote

If it scale properly it got my vote.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to