-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 21 Jun 2006, at 09:11, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:27:43PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Still thinking about this - but is there any place here for the
"minimum request interval" mechanism we used in 0.5?
This supercedes the minimum request interval mechanism, by passing
tokens rather than trying to determine rates. It's better - it's more
precise, it reacts more accurately as well as faster. It more
accurately
simulates the underlying metaphor or incompressible fluid flow in a
network of pipes.
One of the points of the MRI mechanism was to reallocate (what are
now being called) tokens from nodes where they weren't being used to
nodes where they were.
In the proposed scheme, what happens if one neighbor is sending a lot
of requests, but none of the other neighbors are sending any, so the
one "greedy" neighbor's needs can be satisfied?
Ian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEmgQxQtgxRWSmsqwRAgJDAJ9Al8XWNn+xg2D3LG0SWHtusPwdEgCaA1AE
UGFwOkLS2ag8pgsANGoZqHE=
=1Smw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
