The reason for that is that when people ask somebody like me what to
use for their anonymity on the internet, i tell them about freenet,
with the opennet i will have to mention that they should make sure to
go for darknet if they want to be truly anonymous.
And what is wrong with that?
If you are approaching this from perspective "but people want it" then
a lot of people want blocks to be marked by the extension of the file,
so that they can say "i only want MP3 in my datastore" are you
planning to implement this? Then why are you still going for the opennet?
Now this really is a silly argument. We don't make it easy for people
to filter their datastores because it would hurt Freenet, but allowing
people to be part of an opennet, having made an informed decision to do
so, doesn't hurt Freenet, it helps the network by allowing more peers
and a richer link density.
Ian.
Ok, i give up. I still think that you are going to suck darknet dry the day you release
opennet. But it's not my project.
- Volodya
--
Hi! I am a .SIG virus! Copy me to your SIG so that I can spread!
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://www.whengendarmesleeps.org/ When Gendarme Sleeps, Anarchy's Zine of
Poetry
========================
"None of us are free until all of us are free."
~ Mihail Bakunin
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
