On Sunday 02 July 2006 15:04, Florent Daignière wrote: > * Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-02 11:52:19]: > > > This is exactly the type of thing I was worried would happen. > > Automated access to information about the node is exactly what FCP is > > intended for, and exactly what fproxy isn't intended for. We > > definitely should not be encouraging people to write scripts to > > scrape fproxy pages by trying to make them easier to parse. Fproxy > > is not, and will never be intended to provide a stable API for this > > kind of thing. > > > > Please revert this, and instead, work on bug #200 (https:// > > bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=200) > > > > Ian. > > I do agree ; it's not a good idea. > > Reverted in r9429 > > NextGen$
Thank You. Ed _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
