* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-10 22:54:07]: > I would support making it conditional on a flag; node.aggressiveGC=<-1 > or period in seconds>. >
I've done it in r9589 ... the period isn't in seconds. Maybe I should tweak the config. callback to prevent silly users from DoSing themselves setting to low values. > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:17:13AM +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: > > * Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-09 02:05:43]: > > > > > > > > On 9 Jul 2006, at 01:40, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: > > > > > > > * Colin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-08 23:41:24]: > > > > > > > >> Fair- The profilers I found all seemed to be GUI based- I run my node > > > >> on a server without X, that I can only access via SSH. I know Java > > > >> 1.5 has a way do generate a profile text file, though.. > > > >> I'll look into it, I suppose. > > > > > > > > No need to : I can explain the current strategy: > > > > > > > > We *force* the GC every 18.25 sec in our MemoryChecker thread. So, > > > > yes, > > > > it probaly creates CPU spikes ;) > > > > > > Indeed, it could be the cause of all our CPU issues. Can you explain > > > the rationale for this? > > > > > > I have heard Java engineers say that the System.gc() command is one > > > of the most abused commands in the Java API - because 99.9% of the > > > time programmers think they should use it, they are wrong. > > > > > > Ian. > > > > from : > > > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/MemoryChecker.java?rev=8876&view=markup > > > > // FIXME > > // Do not remove until all known memory issues fixed, > > // Especially #66 > > // This probably reduces performance, but it makes > > // memory usage *more predictable*. This will make > > // tracking down the sort of nasty unpredictable OOMs > > // we are getting much easier. > > > > Toad wrote that thread ... see > > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=66 > > > > Maybe it was just the NPTL-related bug :/ Maybe we can disable it on > > user's nodes and let it enabled on developers' ones ... the problem > > beeing that incidents like that hardly ever occur on developer's nodes :'( > > and that user's nodes aren't running at loglevel=MINOR. > > > > NextGen$ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > -- > Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
