We could try it on the basis that simpler is, all else being equal, better.

Ian.

On 10 Aug 2006, at 16:19, Matthew Toseland wrote:

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:08:11AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:

Specifically:

Metric M, lower is better. M could be proportion of requests rejected,
or it could be time for a successful request.

Distance d = routing distance from target to peer.location.

If peer.M < median.M:
return d
Else
return d * median.M / peer.M

d * peer.M / median.M
(so it gets bigger) :)

I still wonder whether we should try option 0 though (no load
balancing).
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc.
phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to