On 25 Sep 2006, at 16:05, toad wrote:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-26) on servalan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.1.4 Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:54:09 +0100 design ideas]
toad wrote: So we force the distribution? Hmmm. We don't have to force the distribution if we path fold on successful requests, but forcing it is better in that it will almost certainly work regardless of e.g. local traffic levels.
I don't get it? Why would you want to try to pick links explicitely according to a given distribution, when we know that just choosing the destination of incoming queries should work fine. Did I miss something?
Its not necessary, it is just to help things along - it should work fine without it.
Ian.
|
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
