Re: [freenet-dev] Adding more index sites

Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:22:43 -0700

With no description and only two letters it could be anything, assuming kp stands for kiddy porn says what about you?

On 10/3/06, Ian Clarke < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would he want to risk breaking the law by viewing a website where the name of that site indicates that it is child pornography?

Ian.

On 3 Oct 2006, at 17:01, Juiceman wrote:

GASP kp.  If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some
light bondage gear aka kinky porn.

On 10/3/06, toad < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We should add some more index sites.
Currently we only have the Darknet Index:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],3ocfrqgUMVWA2PeorZx40TW0c-FiIOL-TWKQHoDbVdE,AQABAAE/Index/40/index.html

The problem with this is it hasn't been updated in ages.

There is the public index (which is always up to date, it seems), but
IMHO it would be unwise to link to something which is globally writable;
somebody may replace it with a redirect to the goat man, or worse, in the
middle of us being /.ed or doing a major release.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ,NzdivUGCGOdlgngOGRbbKDNfSCnjI0FXjHLzJM4xkJ4,AQABAAE/index/83/

Then there is Indicia. This has activelinks, but offensive activelinks
are censored. It has descriptions for every site, although some of them
are ambiguous, and it is categorised. And it's updated regularly. A first
time user browsing Indicia will only run into porn if they want it, and
as far as I can see there is no outrageous child porn at the moment, and
even if there was it would almost certainly be labelled properly.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Indicia/31/

And there is Another Index. This is uncensored, no pictures, with no
manual descriptions, although it may be manually categorised. The
problem is that on the Porn section it links to a site called "kp",
without explaining the (sadly well-known amongst freenet users) acronym.

[EMAIL PROTECTED],hv-2~OfetXkb0FhDuPxorWIf0wXeZKPEfdIhwyh-mhk,AQABAAE/AnotherIndex/27/

Which of these should we put on our homepage? Ian has stated that our
policy must be to link to those indexes which will best help users to
find content, without prejudice to the nature of that content. Indicia
scores very high on this count, by virtue of having descriptions. IMHO
another, related requirement we should impose is that newbies won't run
into child porn without being warned about it at some stage.

So should we include AnotherIndex, or not? If we do, should we include a
warning that it doesn't provide descriptions and there may be
objectionable content? If we're going to put warnings on, should we
include the Public Index as well?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIoHdA9rUluQ9pFARAv5bAJwONWYpvYDFr1FPdjoCdz9IbETN0ACghtld
Lq/0OdGdzXlO9fE7oCQooaw=
=OND7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list




-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list


Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc.
phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl




--
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin 
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to