On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:23:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, this explains some of the details. I always thought 0.7 is a > complete rewrite. And unit tests are great! > > 0.5 was reviewed, because many different people worked with the code > (vanessa, I, and more) and they checked the parts of the code they > worked with.
No, *complete* rewrites are a waste of time; 0.7 was rewritten architectually speaking but we imported old code wherever it was useful. Including the crypto code, which worked in 0.5 because it had a 128-bit block size.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
