https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=1147

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:10:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did you see this message from Frost? Is he right?
> 
> ----- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- 2007.02.13 - 14:47:52GMT -----
> 
> I don't have bookmarks. But even then, I don't understand why the
> USKChecker counts don't go down. See this new graph from the latest
> hours. I've launched fetchs for ~300 different USKs some hours ago.
> I'd expect the USKChecker count to reach some plateau and start
> dropping after a while...
> 
> ----- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- 2007.02.13 - 18:36:47GMT -----
> 
> I've inspected the USKManager a bit more and I've found that this method:
> 
> synchronized void finished(USKFetcher f) {
>    USK u = f.getOriginalUSK();
>    fetchersByUSK.remove(u);           
> }
> 
> is the only place where a fetcher is removed from fetchersByUSK.
> However, according to eclipse, there's no references to it. I.e.,
> nobody is calling that method. After placing some logs in USKManager,
> I indeed see that after retrieving some USK using the /-1/ edition
> form, it remains in the fetchersByUSK collection.
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to