On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-12 14:06:28]: > > > I looked over your source, but where is the point when the node READS > > the file written by the client? It looks like the readFile is created > > by the node? > > > > Did I misunderstand this? > > Yes, "known issue" ... in the final version of the protocol the client > will choose the filename and the node will return if it can read from > it or not (assuming the file isn't empty).
Why would the filename be created by the client? I thought the protocol was that the node writes a file which the client must read, then it tells the client to write a specific block of data to a specific file which the client must create. I will review the code soon, today. > > I don't know if the node ought to prove it to the client (returning a > salted hash of the content for instance) or not. > > Any views on the topic ?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
