* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-31 00:04:52]: > On Wednesday 30 May 2007 22:32, Florent Daignière wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-30 > > 20:24:14]: > > > Is this safe by default? Are you planning to deal with UP&P > > > based on this code too? > > > > Yes binding only to "trusted" interfaces is safe... I don't see any > > kind of UI we could use not requiering the user to understand the > > CIDR notation and so on... so I just gave up :) Assuming that geeks > > will find the way to do it and other users won't need it anyway. > > Well, we could identify the number of LANs the node is on, and the > number of direct internet connections, that'd be a good start. If > it's 1/1, the user is probably directly connected, so we're only > asking about FCP; if it's 1/0, the user is either directly connected, > on a shared LAN with a NAT, or on a private LAN with a NAT. And > so on. > >
We could; I'm not sure it worths it though. > > I dunno yet, I'll keep it simple at the beginning and make it > > evolve over time depending on feedback given by newbies. > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
