* David ???Bombe??? Roden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-31 18:34:20]: > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 16:31 +0100, Florent Daignière wrote: > > > I don't... Keep in mind that FCP is insecure by design... > > Now you're the second person reminding me of that. Please, PLEASE tell > why an FCP client should be allowed to request illegal material but not > to create a new key pair?
That's what the GenerateSSK message is for. > Or sign a message with a previously generated > key? > > I'm seriously wondering what people think I am suggesting here. Maybe > you can elaborate on that. Will elaborate replying to Zothar :) NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
