On Friday 21 December 2007 15:46, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Ouch ... does that mean we always timeout?! In fact, surely the > > below will NPE > > if sender == null? > > That's the way I read it! If this is correct, that means that all CHK > inserts in the past have been successful only on collision. That is: > (1) insert it, (2) timeout, (3) insert it again and see that it is > already there. > > If you see a NPE that I've introduced or fixed please be more > specific, I don't understand.
No, I misread it w.r.t. NPE.
pgp1dQbsXudLy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
