On Jan 11, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:

I'm thinking that the SEND_TIMEOUT will need to be increased, I really
am not familiar with what the average network condition will be like.
Feel free to change the SEND_TIMEOUTs to your liking.

IMHO it should be equal to ACCEPTED_TIMEOUT. Although with message
prioritisation I'm not sure conditionalSend does anything useful?

I agree, and have reverted r16959 in r17006.

With message prioritization, the marginal utility it *might* provide in extreme cases will both (1) be quickly detected with the standard backoff/routing, and (2) not be worth the increased code complexity.

--
Robert Hailey

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to