On Friday 11 January 2008 19:06, Michael Rogers wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> Not just leaves, but perhaps nodes whose neighbours all belong to
> >> different clusters?
> > 
> > Yeah, this could be a problem... Dunno how we'd deal with that...
> 
> I guess if opennet nodes are going to be excluded from premix routing
> then some darknet nodes could also be excluded.

Opennet nodes might have a completely different premix routing mechanism, 
something closer to I2P (more opportunity for cheating at the peer selection 
layer).
> 
> I have some notes somewhere on various ways of defining cluster and
> cliques... I'll see if there's anything that could be used to agree on
> the membership of a cell.

That would be useful.

Attachment: pgpXuOuP5dsh4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to